Sunday, December 8, 2013

LISD hiring process revisited two years after improper student-educator relationships


During the 2011-2012 school year the Lockhart Independent School District and school board experienced a year unlike most after Lockhart High School faced not only one, but two incidences of improper relationships between a teacher and student.

In November 2011, the Lockhart Police Department arrested Thomas Christopher Knox, 28 at the time, after learning of his improper relationship with a 16-year-old female student. Knox posted bail the same day of his arrest and would later be charged with sexual assault of a minor in July of 2012, in which he posted bail as well. Months later after Knox’s initial arrest in May of 2012, Lockhart High School’s librarian Tricia Porter was also arrested after administrators had suspicions of her student-educator relationship with a 18-year-old male student.

According to the Texas Penal Code, an improper relationship between an educator and student is a second-degree felony. The penal code states the teacher commits a felony if he or she “engages in sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse with a person who is enrolled in a public or private primary or secondary school at which the employee works.”

Almost two years after the improper relationships occurred, LISD Assistant Superintendent Larry Ramirez said he still trusts their hiring process despite of the fact the two incidences took place in the same year.  

“I’m not sure how any school can prevent something like this from happening,” said Ramirez. “But the idea is to make sure this never happens again, and we do the very best we can. I think our process is solid, but people just do stupid things.”

Although not much has changed in the hiring process, Ramirez said he and the rest of the hiring staff have specifically emphasized talking to the interviewee’s last boss or principal as being one of the most critical parts of the process.

“I don’t want to talk to their supervisors down the road,” said Ramirez. “We talk to the most immediate supervisor. There have been people in the past that haven’t wanted me to talk to their most recent boss, and they didn’t get hired.”

“Even if it’s a custodial position, we must make contact with whoever was that person’s last supervisor,” said Monica Guillory, principal of Lockhart High School. “I personally at the high school always contact at least three sources of information. The district only requires two, but I feel a little safer calling three.”

Guillory said LISD requires all teachers to be fingerprinted and complete a nationwide background along with the statewide search as well. Contact logs that students must sign for tutorials have also been implemented and stressed more since the improper student-educator incidences.

“I don’t want students going in teacher’s rooms for tutorials without there being a record of it,” said Guillory. “This includes after school, before school, during lunch and conference periods.”

Guillory said since the incidences, the high school staff are better educated and informed of having any kind of contact with students that could be deemed inappropriate. The staff go through two extensive rounds of human resource training at the beginning of the year when they are hired and again before the school year starts, she said.

“Once they are hired they are trained and then again, not just the new staff but also the returning staff,” said Guillory. “We remind them to always be professional and to not make comments or remarks that could be taken out of context or contact with them on social media.”

Frances Winkler, a parent in the community of Lockhart whose son now attends a charter school in Austin, said she was shocked when she learned of the two student-educator incidences, but she doesn’t blame the school for the improper relationships.

“It’s the responsibility of the school to do the background checks and training but not their fault if a teacher crosses the line,” said Winkler. “It doesn’t make sense, but it happens and you deal with it. Maybe there should be a psychological test teachers have to take as well.”


“I’m overly cautious because I recognize these are people’s children that we have everyday, and it is our responsibility to protect them,” said Guillory. “While we want to trust our staff, our biggest loyalty is to the parents of the students who come to our school everyday.” 

With recent disappointing seasons, UT’s basketball programs continue to spend and earn big bucks


Mack Brown isn’t the only coach at the University of Texas in the hot seat this season. After missing the NCAA tournament last year with a losing record for the first time since his arrival to the 40 Acres in 1998, men’s head coach Rick Barnes’ future is in question entering his 16th season with the university.

The men’s basketball program hasn’t achieved the expectations of an elite athletic program recently. In the past five years, the Longhorns have not advanced past the 2nd round of the NCAA tournament. Last year’s early exit in the College Basketball Invitation, a tournament many people had never even heard of, was the icing on the cake for a run of disappointing seasons during Barnes’ era. The women’s basketball team has also experienced their fair share of early exits from the women’s NCAA tournament and recent unsatisfactory seasons.

Despite having the worst season during his tenure at UT, Barnes remains one of the highest paid coaches in college basketball, with a salary of $2.4 million. Following last season’s below average 12-18 record, Karen Aston will be making $600,000 entering her second season as the women’s head coach. That’s nearly half of what former head coach Gail Goestenkors was supposed to make in the final two years left in her seven-year contract. The contract would have paid her $1.25 million per season, but Goestenkors resigned from the position after the 2011-2012 season.

In Texas, sports are an important aspect of the state’s culture, especially football. The University of Texas will always be known as one of the top universities in the country that spends millions of dollars for their athletic programs, regardless of their unsuccessful seasons.

Below are charts depicting the revenues of UT’s sports other than football from the 2013 University of Texas Athletics Report. The report includes information from the 2009-2012 seasons. The men’s and women’s basketball teams are in bold:

Men’s Sports Revenues
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
Baseball
$5,650,027
$5,812,088
$7,691,843
Basketball
$15,602,348
$16,437,705
$18,748,467
Golf
$262,178
$347,670
$296,835
Swimming and Diving
$610,891
$684,149
$525,389
Tennis
$195,027
$195,451
$215,525
Track and Field/Cross Country
$423,117
$340,010
$60,994

In each of the three seasons, the revenue from all other sports besides basketball in this chart total less than half of the revenue from men’s basketball alone. Here’s how the women’s sports revenues shaped out:

Women’s Sports Revenues
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
Basketball
$1,769,333
$1,754,323
$1,582,747
Golf
$222,827
$265,280
$202,891
Rowing
$126,979
$131,498
$140,401
Soccer
$585,756
$638,014
$528,707
Softball
$540,917
$641,814
$611,638
Swimming and Diving
$585,445
$757,608
$508,602
Tennis
$194,064
$201,291
$214,964
Track and Field/Cross Country
$375,343
$296,543
$319,029
Volleyball
$1,321,284
$1,438,410
$1,428,665

Despite volleyball’s success over the past few years, women’s basketball revenues continue to top all of UT women’s sports. Below are charts of the men’s and women’s sports expenses from 2009-2012:

Men’s Sports Expenses
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
Baseball
$3,732,260
$3,790,958
$3,389,785
Basketball
$8,887,250
$8,109,741
$8,528,312
Golf
$903,909
$924,188
$922,968
Swimming and Diving
$1,966,538
$2,052,630
$1,932,904
Tennis
$831,456
$824,198
$837,467
Track and Field/Cross Country
$1,742,129
$1,525,750
$1,524,218

Much like the revenue charts, men’s basketball expenses exceeds the total of all other men’s sports other than football combined. Here are the results of the women’s sports expenses:

Women’s Sports Expenses
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
Basketball
$4,532,021
$4,757,675
$4,904,727
Golf
$891,492
$862,203
$754,441
Rowing
$1,408,955
$1,453,076
$1,457,461
Soccer
$1,825,504
$1,953,747
$1,758,192
Softball
$1,453,221
$1,429,639
$1,597,305
Swimming and Diving
$1,760,143
$2,068,432
$1,805,090
Tennis
$848,398
$883,000
$828,167
Track and Field/Cross Country
$1,715,540
$1,854,332
$1,832,962
Volleyball
$2,571,243
$2,820,435
$2,442,330

Once again, women’s basketball leads all other women’s sports in terms of expenses. The results of last year’s revenues and expenses of the men’s and women’s basketball programs were not included in the Athletic Report. According to the Equity in Athletics Data Analysis Cutting Tool of the U.S. Department of Education, here’s how the men’s and women’s basketball expenses and revenues of the 2012-2013 season turned out:

2012-2013
Total Expenses
Total Revenue
Men’s basketball
$8,991,640
$16,896,653
Women’s basketball
$4,688,863
$1,619,530

The women’s basketball team expenses were a little more than half of the men’s expenses in the 2012-2013 season. The women’s basketball team revenues last year were roughly 9.5% of men’s basketball total revenues.


The University of Texas takes their sports very seriously. They wouldn’t spend millions of dollars if they didn’t. This season both programs are off to a good start. The men’s team stands at 7-1 and the women’s team at 6-2. Whether the season ends good or bad for either program, both teams will continue spend and earn tons of money, as well as their coaches. 

Former coach puts teaching on hold to pursue music career


Jasic McDonald loved coaching high school basketball and teaching computer animation and technology classes for seven years. But there was another passion that always remained in the back of McDonald’s mind. 

Music was always a big part of McDonald’s life growing up in Nacogdoches, Texas, whether it was through singing in church during his youth or writings songs as he became older. McDonald began developing his own music by the age of 17.

"All my life I wanted to be a singer, songwriter and producer," said McDonald. "From church to being in the studio with producers to other family members who sang, music has always been a part of my life. It's never left from what I was actually doing."

During his four years in the military after high school, McDonald created his own production company, Liquid Tracks Music Productions, in 2001. After his time with the military, McDonald earned his bachelor’s in business management from Huston-Tillotson University. He taught marketing and technology at several schools including the American Youth Works Charter School, Austin ISD, and Lockhart High School.

McDonald continued to do music on the side during his teaching career by writing songs, producing and helping other artists with their songs. He also started his very own music group, Liquid Tracks Music Group, in 2010. McDonald loved teaching and helping students, but during the 2011-2012 school year he came to a realization when a former student asked him a simple question while eating dinner at a restaurant.

“He asked me what do I love to do the most, singing or teaching,” said McDonald. “He asked me which one I was more passionate about and if I had ever thought about doing music full-time. It made me think about everything.”

After talking with the former student at the restaurant, McDonald decided it was time to make the transition. He left Lockhart High School after the school year ended in 2012 and started working on music full-time.

"The main reason why I changed over was because I felt like it was the time to give myself a chance to run my own business," said McDonald. "I changed over because of the reasons of not giving my full potential of what I love to do. And it’s not just about the money. If you have a passion and love for something, you go for it.”  

McDonald said the transition from teaching to music wasn’t an easy one. A steady income and leaving behind students were some of the biggest obstacles McDonald faced, he said.  The singer, songwriter and producer said the change has allowed him to learn how to budget more effectively from month to month. A few people questioned why McDonald left teaching but overall received support from others, he said.

"When you go out on that limb to do something successful and leaving a job so secure like teaching, you hear people say 'you're crazy for doing that'," said McDonald. "But I always had mentors that always said 'it's your life and the only way you're going to find out is if you do it'."

UT sophomore Lucas Westbrook, one of McDonald’s former students and basketball players, said he respects McDonald’s ambitiousness towards a career in music and admires the work he has put in.

“It takes guts to leave one career to pursue another,” said Westbrook. “But he’s pursuing a career in something he loves. If you’re truly passionate about something, go after that passion and work hard for it. That’s exactly what [McDonald] is doing. I’m proud of him.”

UT junior Jay Baliterra, another former student of McDonald’s, said he along with many other people who knew McDonald were surprised he left teaching to do music full-time. Baltierra said he will still support him and believes people can learn something special from McDonald’s choice.

“We were all kind of shocked when [McDonald] left,” said Baltierra. “I’m still going to root for him regardless. I think he stands as a role model for anyone in the way he took a risk in order to do something he loves and cares about more than anything.”

McDonald is currently working on his first album “The Love Life” and will be touring in the spring of 2014. He also recently applied for Doctoral Learning Technologies at University of North Texas to earn his doctorate.

McDonald said if his music career doesn’t work out the way he envisioned, he could always go back to his other passion; teaching.


“I put music in the front of my goals to see where it’s going to take me,” said McDonald. “If it takes me here and stops, I know I can still do what I’ve been doing in teaching and helping out with people.” 





New restaurant causes parking disruptions


During the Citizen Communications at the Austin city council meeting Oct. 24, Dolores Duffie, a resident on Cherrywood Road northeast of the University of Texas campus, voiced her concerns regarding some parking disruptions in her neighborhood.

The disruptions came after the building of Haymaker, a sandwich restaurant/bar recently opened in September on the corner of Manor and Cherrywood Road. Due to the restaurant’s limited parking spaces, Haymaker’s customers have resulted to parking in surrounding neighborhoods. Duffie said these customers have caused a rise in problems in her neighborhood regarding their parking.

“From the 2900 block up to the 3200 of Cherrywood Road, you cannot park,” said Duffie during her time at the meeting. “[The customers] park across your drive, and you can’t get in or out. I don’t have a problem as long as they don’t block my driveway, but they have.”
Haymaker’s customers have begun parking in neighborhood public streets due to the restaurant’s limited amount of parking space. 
Duffie said the customers have also moved residents’ trashcans in order to park, usually placing them in the middle of their lawns and parking in places where the residents cannot enter or exit their house. She also said some safety issues are involved with these parking problems.

“A lot of us are seniors,” said Duffie. “Three people have disabilities that need EMS from time to time and cannot get to them. We know we can’t stop parking, but someone has to reach a happy medium with us as a community.”

Residents of Cherrywood Road have complained Haymaker’s patrons move their trashcans and blocked driveways in order to find parking spots. “We know that’s a public street,” said Cherrywood Road resident Dolores Duffie. “But they park across your drive, and you can’t get in or out.” 

Councilman Mike Martinez was one of the few council members who responded to Duffie’s concerns at the meeting.  While most of the citizens that speak during the Citizen Communications didn’t receive a response from the council members, Martinez showed interest in Duffie’s comments and gave her more information about the parking situation.

“The restaurant does have the number of required parking spaces for the size of the restaurant, but there is a parking issue,” said Martinez. “Haymaker is currently in conversation with every neighboring property that potentially has parking spaces available and are trying to work out agreements with them so that they can take customers off Cherrywood Road and let them park on those respective lots.”

Councilman Mike Martinez said Gene Johnson Automotive and Haymaker are currently trying to reach an agreement that would allow the restaurant’s customers to park there after Gene Johnson closes. “Gene Johnson closes at 5 p.m., so Haymaker customers would be able to park there after that time,” said Martinez. 

In a separate interview, Councilman Martinez specified what Haymaker was doing in order to find a resolution to the parking issue. He said Haymaker is contemplating using Gene Johnson Automotive Services’ parking lot when they close in the afternoon. If the two businesses agree on this proposal, Haymaker customers would be able to park in that lot after 5 p.m. Martinez also said Haymaker is considering using a valet service. If these issues linger, Martinez said another option is for residents to apply for Residential Permit Parking.

“Residential Permit Parking is based on issues caused in the community,” said Martinez. “You’d have to have a permit to park in certain areas. It is an option being discussed.”

Vortex is one of the few surrounding businesses Haymaker is considering to use for additional parking space. “We are currently reaching out to businesses and lots in the area in attempts to secure additional parking for our patrons,” said Keith Sandel, one of the owners of Haymaker. 

Residential Permit Parking is a program to help residents find available parking in neighborhoods surrounded by properties with businesses. According to the City of Austin website, the program’s “desired outcome is to increase the amount of on-street parking available to residents and their guests while balancing the needs of others who desire to park along the street.” An application process is available on the website, along with guidelines and procedures about the program.

Keith Sandel, one of the owners of Haymaker, said the restaurant has been very busy since its opening and possible solutions are being discussed for the disruption. He said this has caused their patrons to park on the public streets, and the restaurant has received complaints from neighborhood residents, especially on Cherrywood, about the patrons blocking their driveways.


Haymaker is searching for any additional parking to help alleviate the parking disruptions with neighborhood residents since its recent opening in September. 


“We immediately posted signs on our entrances reminding our patrons to not block residential driveways,” said Sandel. “We are also planning on attending the next Cherrywood Neighborhood Association in order to discuss their concerns and have invited a City of Austin representative to join us in order to clear up any questions that may arise concerning COA rules and regulations.”

Martinez said he realizes residents feel like curb space in their neighborhood is theirs, but the streets are publicly available to patrons as well. To help eliminate the disruptions, customers need to be educated about where to park on the curbs, he said.


“We’re going to have to step up enforcement if this continues,” said Martinez. “We want the business to thrive, but we also don’t want the neighborhood residents to have negative experiences with Haymaker.”